Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-20 16:08:02 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: A1C6A06E19145822C62390954EB359DEA9D9175B4D36FF72D2CEC910571AF7C1
Participant Details
Original Note:
Contrary to the OP Supreme Court precedent states that issuing a pardon to a person who has not been charged with a crime implies they committed a crime and accepting that pardon is an implied admission of guilt. Burdick v United States, 236 U.S. 79 (1915) https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep236/usrep236079/usrep236079.pdf
All Note Details