Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-20 13:58:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 895AE6CE7C7925A2D52E94F646BBEC900562C51C3B76B8F99BF99DEF70689D7A
Participant Details
Original Note:
Contrary to the OP Supreme Court precedent states that issuing a pardon to a person who has not been charged with a crime implies they committed a crime and accepting that pardon is an implied admission of guilt. Burdick v United States, 236 U.S. 79 (1915) https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep236/usrep236079/usrep236079.pdf
All Note Details