Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-21 01:24:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 580DBFDB6D8CCD2B2E26D6A391D5E4A6ABE7982F2C1196CEC8E2B13616C5850F
Participant Details
Original Note:
Contrary to the OP Supreme Court precedent states that issuing a pardon to a person who has not been charged with a crime implies they committed a crime and accepting that pardon is an implied admission of guilt. Burdick v United States, 236 U.S. 79 (1915) https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep236/usrep236079/usrep236079.pdf
All Note Details