Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-20 14:42:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 07A1825088AE8F0EACFE31D65177C1EF51ED81889E23C377D206C624E2AD139C
Participant Details
Original Note:
Contrary to the OP Supreme Court precedent states that issuing a pardon to a person who has not been charged with a crime implies they committed a crime and accepting that pardon is an implied admission of guilt. Burdick v United States, 236 U.S. 79 (1915) https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep236/usrep236079/usrep236079.pdf
All Note Details