Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-20 18:03:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 21F2DE71FE5DE132597203F70302652E550408F32C13A13F61D1B9A486930C13
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original post did not show someone giving “criticism”, it showed them accusing/insulting a group of people by calling them “pedophiles” with no evidence. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/criticism https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/accusation https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/insult

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1881316791114149941
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 21F2DE71FE5DE132597203F70302652E550408F32C13A13F61D1B9A486930C13
  • createdAtMillis - 1737396213392
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188131679111414994121F2DE71FE5DE132597203F70302652E550408F32C13A13F61D1B9A486930C13