Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-20 09:34:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 04BF7AD63D46F7EF5175313690B1E7DC49243AC5300CFBBA902BAAAD7AF25105
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is normal practice in UK trials and is not specific to the Southport case. https://www.gov.uk/contempt-of-court

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1881258890001592638
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 04BF7AD63D46F7EF5175313690B1E7DC49243AC5300CFBBA902BAAAD7AF25105
  • createdAtMillis - 1737365654038
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188125889000159263804BF7AD63D46F7EF5175313690B1E7DC49243AC5300CFBBA902BAAAD7AF25105