Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-19 21:31:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C9966B6BED7F7BFE16A26260AD32998722A36DF9AD366CAA9E362D885990EA6B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Author of this post subsequently admits that he was wrong about these claims but doesn’t care much that these are lies because he feels justified in providing positive counter-lies in response to criticisms of China He should be understood as a dishonest actor https://twitter.com/johnnyakzam/status/1880817496095379766?s=46&t=rvv0PESvSnjiEaP0O_Lmvg

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1881034766700724249
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C9966B6BED7F7BFE16A26260AD32998722A36DF9AD366CAA9E362D885990EA6B
createdAtMillis - 1737322301329
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1881034766700724249C9966B6BED7F7BFE16A26260AD32998722A36DF9AD366CAA9E362D885990EA6B