Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-19 14:42:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C6AA9674B7FE3D7F7C0EB84BEBA6B7B6189026D1A634E9AAF94163B8318C05C7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ban was deemed constitutional in a unanimous ruling by SCOTUS. "The challenged provisions further an important Government interest unrelated to the suppression of free expression and do not burden substantially more speech than necessary to further that interest." https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-656_ca7d.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1880985596761358482
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C6AA9674B7FE3D7F7C0EB84BEBA6B7B6189026D1A634E9AAF94163B8318C05C7
  • createdAtMillis - 1737297738696
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1880985596761358482C6AA9674B7FE3D7F7C0EB84BEBA6B7B6189026D1A634E9AAF94163B8318C05C7