Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-19 16:31:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C34967F04CE4B31ED5314A09336765DD85153A856B4C13F1F459A6E5D926F4DF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ban was deemed constitutional in a unanimous ruling by SCOTUS. "The challenged provisions further an important Government interest unrelated to the suppression of free expression and do not burden substantially more speech than necessary to further that interest." https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-656_ca7d.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1880985596761358482
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C34967F04CE4B31ED5314A09336765DD85153A856B4C13F1F459A6E5D926F4DF
  • createdAtMillis - 1737304296421
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1880985596761358482C34967F04CE4B31ED5314A09336765DD85153A856B4C13F1F459A6E5D926F4DF