Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-19 14:59:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 68B4A296FDC82C6C05FC17C8A4D0D6FA6E6D9FE692758D96E305C61BD9290BD1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ban was deemed constitutional in a unanimous ruling by SCOTUS. "The challenged provisions further an important Government interest unrelated to the suppression of free expression and do not burden substantially more speech than necessary to further that interest." https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-656_ca7d.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1880985596761358482
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 68B4A296FDC82C6C05FC17C8A4D0D6FA6E6D9FE692758D96E305C61BD9290BD1
  • createdAtMillis - 1737298775698
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188098559676135848268B4A296FDC82C6C05FC17C8A4D0D6FA6E6D9FE692758D96E305C61BD9290BD1