Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-19 23:06:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1019C24D61EB6F83CD9928E45E2E5B5E983B9BEE23CC16AAEB14FF11D6BBC50A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ban was deemed constitutional in a unanimous ruling by SCOTUS. "The challenged provisions further an important Government interest unrelated to the suppression of free expression and do not burden substantially more speech than necessary to further that interest." https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-656_ca7d.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1880985596761358482
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1019C24D61EB6F83CD9928E45E2E5B5E983B9BEE23CC16AAEB14FF11D6BBC50A
  • createdAtMillis - 1737327970729
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18809855967613584821019C24D61EB6F83CD9928E45E2E5B5E983B9BEE23CC16AAEB14FF11D6BBC50A