Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-19 16:43:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A355AFE6B5DE4AB71D7C6BFD55708F176B75C40ED82F957A290F9038D803B224
Participant Details

Original Note:

Occasionally, SCOTUS opinions are overturned by subsequent decisions. OP is simply voicing an opinion that the recent SCOTUS decision which allows the tiktok ban ought to be overturned for reasons relating to its Constitutionality. https://constitution.congress.gov/resources/decisions-overruled/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1880924664844911023
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A355AFE6B5DE4AB71D7C6BFD55708F176B75C40ED82F957A290F9038D803B224
  • createdAtMillis - 1737305002498
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1880924664844911023A355AFE6B5DE4AB71D7C6BFD55708F176B75C40ED82F957A290F9038D803B224