Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-19 15:56:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4307E57D6DCC4BD187C1437BAF3615CDF9E7C4C18837B28C10CE3A652F091CFD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Occasionally, SCOTUS opinions are overturned by subsequent decisions. OP is simply voicing an opinion that the recent SCOTUS decision which allows the tiktok ban ought to be overturned for reasons relating to its Constitutionality. https://constitution.congress.gov/resources/decisions-overruled/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1880924664844911023
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4307E57D6DCC4BD187C1437BAF3615CDF9E7C4C18837B28C10CE3A652F091CFD
  • createdAtMillis - 1737302196268
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18809246648449110234307E57D6DCC4BD187C1437BAF3615CDF9E7C4C18837B28C10CE3A652F091CFD