Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-18 20:03:04 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4E9FDDEF94853BCC3EF57D0DC53F3C0C10797AB73E1CA7DB74F523106EC77BAF
Participant Details

Original Note:

This proposed amendment was not ratified within the time limit imposed. The Supreme Court has already ruled (Dillion v Gloss) that Congress indeed has the right to add time limits to the ratification process. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/256/368/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1880682332643811384
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4E9FDDEF94853BCC3EF57D0DC53F3C0C10797AB73E1CA7DB74F523106EC77BAF
  • createdAtMillis - 1737230584601
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18806823326438113844E9FDDEF94853BCC3EF57D0DC53F3C0C10797AB73E1CA7DB74F523106EC77BAF