Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-19 09:11:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3C4248AE24E8818923FA27FE104F81D6DF476E282C1A4A6C3E6D9C94D0260284
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'affaire du Fonds Marianne n'établit nullement que l'argent aurait été détourné "par des fact-checkers" mais identifie l'opacité des critères d'attribution et l'absence de réalisation d'une des 15 associations subventionnées. https://www.senat.fr/notice-rapport/2022/r22-829-1-notice.html https://www.liberation.fr/dossier/fonds-marianne/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1880631408781361612
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3C4248AE24E8818923FA27FE104F81D6DF476E282C1A4A6C3E6D9C94D0260284
  • createdAtMillis - 1737277899159
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18806314087813616123C4248AE24E8818923FA27FE104F81D6DF476E282C1A4A6C3E6D9C94D0260284