Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-18 17:11:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 93402D470FE3239C921207683378FF28AAC37210E3EEF742A51BE77215A09373
Participant Details

Original Note:

It was in Guangzhou but removed in 2013 after being reported and complained by the citizens in 2012…https://td.gd.gov.cn/dtxw_n/tpxw/content/mpost_4484272.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1880615545269309484
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 93402D470FE3239C921207683378FF28AAC37210E3EEF742A51BE77215A09373
  • createdAtMillis - 1737220280340
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 188061554526930948493402D470FE3239C921207683378FF28AAC37210E3EEF742A51BE77215A09373