Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-18 18:32:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1935CEFBE82E40C970FF05C6E28FC36306D9F9C7A64911D0BF05554C1A6AC47F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Twitter n'a jamais été représentatif de l'opinion. En 2016, les idées de gauche y étaient prédominantes. https://shs.cairn.info/revue-politiques-de-communication-2016-1-page-31?lang=fr Une étude de D.Chavalarias a montré dès 2022 un renforcement de la communication antisystème avec une passerelle entre extrême droite et extrême gauche. https://www.senat.fr/rap/r23-739-1/r23-739-18.html#toc42

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1880505855088464219
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 1935CEFBE82E40C970FF05C6E28FC36306D9F9C7A64911D0BF05554C1A6AC47F
createdAtMillis - 1737225158164
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18805058550884642191935CEFBE82E40C970FF05C6E28FC36306D9F9C7A64911D0BF05554C1A6AC47F