Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-18 11:03:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9A256AA459A80E548EE4E3D4407B4373D0B31D7545767FFF25A528FA6507BBCB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - nenhuma nota necessária neste post. Alem disso a nota anterior trás informações distorcidas, o caso das rachadinhas foi anulado por conta do foro privilegiado do deputado, e não por sua inocência https://www.cartacapital.com.br/politica/o-que-aconteceu-com-o-caso-da-rachadinha-de-flavio-bolsonaro/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1880456511291351185
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9A256AA459A80E548EE4E3D4407B4373D0B31D7545767FFF25A528FA6507BBCB
  • createdAtMillis - 1737198205998
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18804565112913511859A256AA459A80E548EE4E3D4407B4373D0B31D7545767FFF25A528FA6507BBCB