Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-18 23:57:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 03C0F9EB9CDAAFDC67A3B94C8F73F161E25AA80A15EF31A400BAAC6142612469
Participant Details

Original Note:

A suprema corte não proibiu o uso ou o conteúdo do TikTok. Apenas afirma que é legal a decisão do congresso de não permitir que governos de países adversários, no caso a China, controlem empresas cono a TikTok. A decisão do congresso não violou a "first amendment". https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/17/supreme-court-rules-to-uphold-tiktok-ban.html?__source=newsletter%7Cbreakingnews

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1880453027766649257
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 03C0F9EB9CDAAFDC67A3B94C8F73F161E25AA80A15EF31A400BAAC6142612469
  • createdAtMillis - 1737244679627
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188045302776664925703C0F9EB9CDAAFDC67A3B94C8F73F161E25AA80A15EF31A400BAAC6142612469