Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-18 06:31:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F6E2C1DDDAAC806E215519EF172771BB23B040AF870465885F83D2D7CADD07B9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Le post cite clairement la "non mise en concurrence", présente sa vision de l'affaire. Pas d'infos erronés, pas de CN, arrêtez d'abuser les CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1880421513267912733
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F6E2C1DDDAAC806E215519EF172771BB23B040AF870465885F83D2D7CADD07B9
  • createdAtMillis - 1737181897528
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1880421513267912733F6E2C1DDDAAC806E215519EF172771BB23B040AF870465885F83D2D7CADD07B9