Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-17 22:06:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F9E921E8292D4F6D2AD5A8E0D3FD99437EB63A6C68E7A3D11672A5A6579A516A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. If you don’t have a credible source yourself, spare everyone the pathetic attempt at writing a note saying it could be false. It could just as easily be true; it’s not your place to play referee. Leave it in the comments and move on. And don’t abuse CNs by expressing opinion

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1880373525761921153
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F9E921E8292D4F6D2AD5A8E0D3FD99437EB63A6C68E7A3D11672A5A6579A516A
  • createdAtMillis - 1737151581950
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1880373525761921153F9E921E8292D4F6D2AD5A8E0D3FD99437EB63A6C68E7A3D11672A5A6579A516A