Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-17 19:59:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0EBE1CA5ED93A4E24FA2403DE8DF9F7BB51BFB5E7D5B5C4F3762A445DAECED91
Participant Details

Original Note:

Diferente do que a jornalista afirma, a Suprema Corte dos EUA, apenas afirmou que é constitucional o banimento do referido aplicativo aprovado no Congresso https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/internacional/suprema-corte-dos-eua-rejeita-recurso-do-tiktok-que-pode-ser-banido/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1880333997265617259
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0EBE1CA5ED93A4E24FA2403DE8DF9F7BB51BFB5E7D5B5C4F3762A445DAECED91
  • createdAtMillis - 1737143996622
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18803339972656172590EBE1CA5ED93A4E24FA2403DE8DF9F7BB51BFB5E7D5B5C4F3762A445DAECED91