Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-17 03:48:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D1F37EA28EE0739B4CAAD8E6A1BE3B6FDE8CE354610C707008F43E5E0B413E3D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The notes make irrelevant points. One basically claims, "But China censors too," which doesn't negate that the USA is censoring as well. The other argues that restricting availability isn't censorship, but it is. The post is factually correct and doesn't need any notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1880021758322917671
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D1F37EA28EE0739B4CAAD8E6A1BE3B6FDE8CE354610C707008F43E5E0B413E3D
  • createdAtMillis - 1737085688110
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1880021758322917671D1F37EA28EE0739B4CAAD8E6A1BE3B6FDE8CE354610C707008F43E5E0B413E3D