Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-17 05:12:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A090B2C0FEDEA9C02AF9EEA97EE16F0AF5C12ECA9D771AF834DB8F37A1154A85
Participant Details

Original Note:

The notes make irrelevant points. One basically claims, "But China censors too," which doesn't negate that the USA is censoring as well. The other argues that restricting availability isn't censorship, but it is. The post is factually correct and doesn't need any notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1880021758322917671
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A090B2C0FEDEA9C02AF9EEA97EE16F0AF5C12ECA9D771AF834DB8F37A1154A85
  • createdAtMillis - 1737090733722
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1880021758322917671A090B2C0FEDEA9C02AF9EEA97EE16F0AF5C12ECA9D771AF834DB8F37A1154A85