Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-17 14:53:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 659B1E5105EB5F1B4EBEBDAEAF28CE9378F740A072DC79A2A8DF4BEE2D08880D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The notes make irrelevant points. One basically claims, "But China censors too," which doesn't negate that the USA is censoring as well. The other argues that restricting availability isn't censorship, but it is. The post is factually correct and doesn't need any notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1880021758322917671
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 659B1E5105EB5F1B4EBEBDAEAF28CE9378F740A072DC79A2A8DF4BEE2D08880D
  • createdAtMillis - 1737125617495
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1880021758322917671659B1E5105EB5F1B4EBEBDAEAF28CE9378F740A072DC79A2A8DF4BEE2D08880D