Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-17 14:41:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 636A0E859E26A709113574A9C8F4BE8745F6A1F6557B3418B4EADBE980F4AA12
Participant Details

Original Note:

The notes make irrelevant points. One basically claims, "But China censors too," which doesn't negate that the USA is censoring as well. The other argues that restricting availability isn't censorship, but it is. The post is factually correct and doesn't need any notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1880021758322917671
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 636A0E859E26A709113574A9C8F4BE8745F6A1F6557B3418B4EADBE980F4AA12
  • createdAtMillis - 1737124879203
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1880021758322917671636A0E859E26A709113574A9C8F4BE8745F6A1F6557B3418B4EADBE980F4AA12