Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-17 03:41:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 35CFC6EE519074CCD9A6E49C81F4C61C0E3FEA1B9A9B3AF753C5E910113C84E2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The notes make irrelevant points. One basically claims, "But China censors too," which doesn't negate that the USA is censoring as well. The other argues that restricting availability isn't censorship, but it is. The post is factually correct and doesn't need any notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1880021758322917671
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 35CFC6EE519074CCD9A6E49C81F4C61C0E3FEA1B9A9B3AF753C5E910113C84E2
  • createdAtMillis - 1737085286248
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188002175832291767135CFC6EE519074CCD9A6E49C81F4C61C0E3FEA1B9A9B3AF753C5E910113C84E2