Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-16 23:15:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98F8CCD75EDDCADC834DCCA020B57F292F22DDD94B7210A59B053353925E47B8
Participant Details

Original Note:

De auteur gaat voorbij aan de motivering van de rechtbank in haar vonnis. Niet de ‘white lives matter’ uitspraak an sich was het probleem (zoals de auteur wel pretendeert). De daders waren recidivist en projecteerden ook andere teksten en links naar racistische websites. https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:RBROT:2025:504&showbutton=true&idx=3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1880016947493900768
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 98F8CCD75EDDCADC834DCCA020B57F292F22DDD94B7210A59B053353925E47B8
  • createdAtMillis - 1737069340969
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 188001694749390076898F8CCD75EDDCADC834DCCA020B57F292F22DDD94B7210A59B053353925E47B8