Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-21 15:12:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FBAA585ECD5B603636B1C19DCCCDE00F95A63B0E203B5462F7657533D3B11A20
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The CN is factually incorrect. The cited text of HR 734 does not limit verification of gender to a review of birth certfiicates. It does not mention birth certificates at all. Thus other more invasive methods to determine gender are not prohibited, as the CN suggests

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1879769311830786309
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FBAA585ECD5B603636B1C19DCCCDE00F95A63B0E203B5462F7657533D3B11A20
  • createdAtMillis - 1737472321774
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1879769311830786309FBAA585ECD5B603636B1C19DCCCDE00F95A63B0E203B5462F7657533D3B11A20