Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-16 02:17:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C951E9363280902C814112B5D0F994550532AA425073C802918C2F8DED9F617D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Primero es Bait, ya que no todos los usuarios pueden ver en 4K, animando a pagar la suscripciĆ³n. Segundo no cita fuentes de calidad de la imagen que explican lo que es, un probable labrado por el viento: https://m.amazings.com/ciencia/noticias/110209a.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1879696607400337701
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C951E9363280902C814112B5D0F994550532AA425073C802918C2F8DED9F617D
  • createdAtMillis - 1736993863953
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1879696607400337701C951E9363280902C814112B5D0F994550532AA425073C802918C2F8DED9F617D