Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-16 18:47:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 32AA9BE90CE2D5191505F5EBACA6EE069C3ECFF1CF9656182CFFD8E8C43C028B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Primero es Bait, ya que no todos los usuarios pueden ver en 4K, animando a pagar la suscripciĆ³n. Segundo no cita fuentes de calidad de la imagen que explican lo que es, un probable labrado por el viento: https://m.amazings.com/ciencia/noticias/110209a.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1879696607400337701
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 32AA9BE90CE2D5191505F5EBACA6EE069C3ECFF1CF9656182CFFD8E8C43C028B
  • createdAtMillis - 1737053252924
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187969660740033770132AA9BE90CE2D5191505F5EBACA6EE069C3ECFF1CF9656182CFFD8E8C43C028B