Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-16 03:29:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 252D1762936CA82A8404850E1C5DFD9651BCC526B7E72C0C1E4AE149550B5055
Participant Details

Original Note:

Primero es Bait, ya que no todos los usuarios pueden ver en 4K, animando a pagar la suscripciĆ³n. Segundo no cita fuentes de calidad de la imagen que explican lo que es, un probable labrado por el viento: https://m.amazings.com/ciencia/noticias/110209a.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1879696607400337701
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 252D1762936CA82A8404850E1C5DFD9651BCC526B7E72C0C1E4AE149550B5055
  • createdAtMillis - 1736998168950
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1879696607400337701252D1762936CA82A8404850E1C5DFD9651BCC526B7E72C0C1E4AE149550B5055