Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-15 15:58:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 649F4E5251690890606A2A9461673B7215FA321BCDF6A7B216C92441B71A5C1C
Participant Details

Original Note:

O autor da matéria cita outros fatores além das noticias falsas para justificar a queda na utilização do pix. E é falso que não hajam publicações que passam a taxação como certa mesmo o governo não considerando-a ATÉ O MOMENTO.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1879549991842152944
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 649F4E5251690890606A2A9461673B7215FA321BCDF6A7B216C92441B71A5C1C
  • createdAtMillis - 1736956710608
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1879549991842152944649F4E5251690890606A2A9461673B7215FA321BCDF6A7B216C92441B71A5C1C