Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-15 19:06:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 34ACBEE5B5BE767FD6310BFA3454B7C0BEA85D0C4A0DAB22F26C4C588E096DEE
Participant Details

Original Note:

O autor da matéria cita outros fatores além das noticias falsas para justificar a queda na utilização do pix. E é falso que não hajam publicações que passam a taxação como certa mesmo o governo não considerando-a ATÉ O MOMENTO.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1879549991842152944
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 34ACBEE5B5BE767FD6310BFA3454B7C0BEA85D0C4A0DAB22F26C4C588E096DEE
  • createdAtMillis - 1736967980370
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187954999184215294434ACBEE5B5BE767FD6310BFA3454B7C0BEA85D0C4A0DAB22F26C4C588E096DEE