Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-15 20:38:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D72000051FA1E023D66A3B3F02E485141A567D9953B0DD51E1A423D8F3C143A6
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'affirmation selon laquelle il serait possible de "manipuler un algorithme" est infondée et dénuée de sens. Les publications de Valérie Hayer peuvent apparaître dans le fil d'actualité d'utilisateurs qui ne la suivent pas, en fonction des critères définis par l'algorithme. https://www.wizishop.fr/blog/algorithme-twitter?utm_source=chatgpt.com

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1879534344340988177
participantId -
raterParticipantId - D72000051FA1E023D66A3B3F02E485141A567D9953B0DD51E1A423D8F3C143A6
createdAtMillis - 1736973535139
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1879534344340988177D72000051FA1E023D66A3B3F02E485141A567D9953B0DD51E1A423D8F3C143A6