Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-15 15:16:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 42A43A2C5CF8B937609A6832C403B6C69F8DBB718C31D55A3125690F5C7B8BF2
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'affirmation selon laquelle il serait possible de "manipuler un algorithme" est infondée et dénuée de sens. Les publications de Valérie Hayer peuvent apparaître dans le fil d'actualité d'utilisateurs qui ne la suivent pas, en fonction des critères définis par l'algorithme. https://www.wizishop.fr/blog/algorithme-twitter?utm_source=chatgpt.com

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1879534344340988177
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 42A43A2C5CF8B937609A6832C403B6C69F8DBB718C31D55A3125690F5C7B8BF2
createdAtMillis - 1736954188729
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 187953434434098817742A43A2C5CF8B937609A6832C403B6C69F8DBB718C31D55A3125690F5C7B8BF2