Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-15 13:21:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E4A58C69E48AE01CA8804B0500A85472EF05E158E0AF2D6E0742F470E6907120
Participant Details

Original Note:

Une fois de plus, @JulienPain poste une information biaisée et ferme la possibilité de commenter ou de partager son intox. Si il avait un minimum de déontologie que l'on souhaite vour chez un vrai fact-checkeur, il aurait fait l'expérience avec d'autres IA. https://x.com/JeanNupes/status/1879498631574966543?t=Gs3cbRBts2pfezgDrrL3Cw&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1879500298512703811
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E4A58C69E48AE01CA8804B0500A85472EF05E158E0AF2D6E0742F470E6907120
createdAtMillis - 1736947289450
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1879500298512703811E4A58C69E48AE01CA8804B0500A85472EF05E158E0AF2D6E0742F470E6907120