Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-15 12:52:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 60E1BF7570448894610E6FCD1DEC569207F2EE45B2D5D1CBFF7FD6F5C3E0AD6D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Une fois de plus, @JulienPain poste une information biaisée et ferme la possibilité de commenter ou de partager son intox. Si il avait un minimum de déontologie que l'on souhaite vour chez un vrai fact-checkeur, il aurait fait l'expérience avec d'autres IA. https://x.com/JeanNupes/status/1879498631574966543?t=Gs3cbRBts2pfezgDrrL3Cw&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1879500298512703811
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 60E1BF7570448894610E6FCD1DEC569207F2EE45B2D5D1CBFF7FD6F5C3E0AD6D
createdAtMillis - 1736945549013
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 187950029851270381160E1BF7570448894610E6FCD1DEC569207F2EE45B2D5D1CBFF7FD6F5C3E0AD6D