Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-15 15:21:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 285B6E4D393AEC6AE6AC2C27259BB4803C7B81738BCF84466A96EF80566D835B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Une fois de plus, @JulienPain poste une information biaisée et ferme la possibilité de commenter ou de partager son intox. Si il avait un minimum de déontologie que l'on souhaite vour chez un vrai fact-checkeur, il aurait fait l'expérience avec d'autres IA. https://x.com/JeanNupes/status/1879498631574966543?t=Gs3cbRBts2pfezgDrrL3Cw&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1879500298512703811
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 285B6E4D393AEC6AE6AC2C27259BB4803C7B81738BCF84466A96EF80566D835B
createdAtMillis - 1736954476974
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1879500298512703811285B6E4D393AEC6AE6AC2C27259BB4803C7B81738BCF84466A96EF80566D835B