Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-15 11:27:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9689956E37C504FAD7C3F6426833F167D7CE50B82352CB8B104192071120C260
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il s'agit ici d'une accusation pénalement répréhensible, et non de liberté d'expression. L'auteur s'exprime sur le fait que son tweet est une blague dans un commentaire sous le tweet original, qui pourrait être manqué par ceux qui voient le premier sans contexte. https://x.com/Vaalxeny/status/1879290111499854162

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1879484105294778627
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 9689956E37C504FAD7C3F6426833F167D7CE50B82352CB8B104192071120C260
createdAtMillis - 1736940458839
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 18794841052947786279689956E37C504FAD7C3F6426833F167D7CE50B82352CB8B104192071120C260