Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-19 14:49:30 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7843F1B5B7AD3A5D96EF2DB8C0BA2C9F2B984475278C4222C2EFC0D1F7908667
Participant Details

Original Note:

La haute autorité de santé estime le bénéfice médical de ce produit comme nul. https://www.has-sante.fr/upload/docs/application/pdf/ct032059.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1879462922767737150
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7843F1B5B7AD3A5D96EF2DB8C0BA2C9F2B984475278C4222C2EFC0D1F7908667
  • createdAtMillis - 1737298170599
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18794629227677371507843F1B5B7AD3A5D96EF2DB8C0BA2C9F2B984475278C4222C2EFC0D1F7908667