Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-15 06:40:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A20F2EF68A833ADECD4A361C1FEB0E6A91B518A5B90AC88F082A415DB6C4DF6F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Without full adjudication and without an opportunity to hear the defense, the outcome of the cases referenced is speculative as well as outside the scope of a special prosecutor. Smith filed motions to dismiss both cases, which the presiding judge granted without prejudice. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R43112.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1879347729052446860
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A20F2EF68A833ADECD4A361C1FEB0E6A91B518A5B90AC88F082A415DB6C4DF6F
  • createdAtMillis - 1736923235337
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1879347729052446860A20F2EF68A833ADECD4A361C1FEB0E6A91B518A5B90AC88F082A415DB6C4DF6F