Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-15 01:21:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 313C4BB9AEB9E6B75CE753E2955B2153D210DF109BC576DA853C770727D56A95
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet clearly references global top 1% income and the source is reasonable. Talking about net worth or national percentiles doesn't change the overall point.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1879311241841394117
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 313C4BB9AEB9E6B75CE753E2955B2153D210DF109BC576DA853C770727D56A95
  • createdAtMillis - 1736904083583
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1879311241841394117313C4BB9AEB9E6B75CE753E2955B2153D210DF109BC576DA853C770727D56A95