Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-15 14:15:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A368E3E9B108DB2AB1CCD5EF86C09148EAD4400D309A6C81C7933E6DDD117E4D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Une note propose 4 références. -RFI-> article du WSJ, étude sur 14 comptes pendant 2 semaines (c'est peu!) aux conclusions mitigées. https://x.com/Fixpir/status/1879193654776283575 -Korben-> étude de U Queensland, omettant l'explication triviale. https://x.com/Fixpir/status/1879168103172751761 Aucune référence à une manipulation dans les articles en allemand.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1879234216807878678
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A368E3E9B108DB2AB1CCD5EF86C09148EAD4400D309A6C81C7933E6DDD117E4D
  • createdAtMillis - 1736950520782
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1879234216807878678A368E3E9B108DB2AB1CCD5EF86C09148EAD4400D309A6C81C7933E6DDD117E4D