Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-14 16:13:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A9A58C46E477751A650B02723526C14D1914591B99E024E713C55F82DB1E8328
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Opinion. Smith expressly & centrally opines that he would have been able to “…obtain and sustain a conviction.” Eg, see pp. 2 (fn 3), 68 & 137 of Smith’s 1/7/25 public report: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25486132-report-of-special-counsel-smith-volume-1-january-2025/?q="sustain a conviction"&mode=search

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1879185243011207631
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A9A58C46E477751A650B02723526C14D1914591B99E024E713C55F82DB1E8328
  • createdAtMillis - 1736871215616
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1879185243011207631A9A58C46E477751A650B02723526C14D1914591B99E024E713C55F82DB1E8328