Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-14 05:25:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EBF0B40A857F446968AAE79D0B8BFE37068790B6877A8CE65FC394C0C050B135
Participant Details

Original Note:

「誤解を招く可能性が有るか無いか」のみを基準に考えれば、このポストを読んで、その通り自転車で十分だなと思う人はまずいないと思われるため(ポストに対する反応を見ても明らか)、コミュニティノートは不要です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1879026709980398059
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EBF0B40A857F446968AAE79D0B8BFE37068790B6877A8CE65FC394C0C050B135
  • createdAtMillis - 1736832344390
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1879026709980398059EBF0B40A857F446968AAE79D0B8BFE37068790B6877A8CE65FC394C0C050B135