Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-14 23:43:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 505A08F4537A8EE524F8EFEDA74E02DE5EFB625E1F508A6A739114F1A8211C4E
Participant Details

Original Note:

「誤解を招く可能性が有るか無いか」のみを基準に考えれば、このポストを読んで、その通り自転車で十分だなと思う人はまずいないと思われるため(ポストに対する反応を見ても明らか)、コミュニティノートは不要です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1879026709980398059
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 505A08F4537A8EE524F8EFEDA74E02DE5EFB625E1F508A6A739114F1A8211C4E
  • createdAtMillis - 1736898224338
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1879026709980398059505A08F4537A8EE524F8EFEDA74E02DE5EFB625E1F508A6A739114F1A8211C4E