Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-13 23:10:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 524C2026014CA06994556AACD86F89F03E97BC0916274766E79CAA049D62AAB3
Participant Details

Original Note:

N - Não é necessário nota nesse post, além da nota sugerida ser distorcida. A Meta irá acabar com a checagem de fatos e isso ficará a cargo dos próprios usuários, como no X, temos um exemplo claro de que é um sistema baseado em opinião pessoal muitas vezes e não em fatos.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1878937060666650987
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 524C2026014CA06994556AACD86F89F03E97BC0916274766E79CAA049D62AAB3
  • createdAtMillis - 1736809834048
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1878937060666650987524C2026014CA06994556AACD86F89F03E97BC0916274766E79CAA049D62AAB3