Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-13 22:31:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 78AFC8E4C595603B9612598C80FF57C9678B61DDFA384DF5FC6D428C3D5C9F80
Participant Details

Original Note:

N - Não é necessário nota neste tweet, a matéria e a Receita Federal já explicaram, a nota sugerida tem viés ideológico, além de utilizar a Gazeta do Povo, já condenado e processado por diversas postagens sabidamente falsas e distorcidas.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1878851992195600814
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 78AFC8E4C595603B9612598C80FF57C9678B61DDFA384DF5FC6D428C3D5C9F80
  • createdAtMillis - 1736807493865
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187885199219560081478AFC8E4C595603B9612598C80FF57C9678B61DDFA384DF5FC6D428C3D5C9F80