Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-01-13 17:15:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 78ACB0ACA1123C0DF96802403A9B30E29B0CBCB82EA234F88FB98958F9B1B391
Participant Details

Original Note:

N - Não é necessário nota neste tweet, a matéria e a Receita Federal já explicaram, a nota sugerida tem viés ideológico, além de utilizar a Gazeta do Povo, já condenado e processado por diversas postagens sabidamente falsas e distorcidas.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1878851992195600814
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 78ACB0ACA1123C0DF96802403A9B30E29B0CBCB82EA234F88FB98958F9B1B391
  • createdAtMillis - 1736788557051
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 187885199219560081478ACB0ACA1123C0DF96802403A9B30E29B0CBCB82EA234F88FB98958F9B1B391